
For
the second time, the Economic Intelligence Unit (EIU) has predicted
victory for the opposition New Patriotic Party when Ghanaians go to the
polls in November 2016.
The report says a stagnant economy is
expected to feed into the NPP narrative that the governing party is not
fit for re-election.
“There is little time for Mr Mahama and the
NDC to turn the economy around before the November 2016 Presidential and
Legislative elections. The Economist Intelligence Unit therefore
expects Nana Akufo-Addo and the NPP to be victorious”
The EIU
report expects the results to be close and warned that the “outcome is
not a foregone conclusion”. It revealed that the NPP needs to maintain
internal unity and reach out beyond its strongholds.
The report points out that Greater Accra is likely to determine who wins 2016.
Full EIU Report
Outlook
for 2016-20 Political stability Ghana will continue to enjoy an
enviable level of political stability in the coming five years, backed
by its robust democracy. This does not mean, however, that it will be
without significant tensions at some points. Public resentment at slow
economic growth by historical standards, electricity shortages, high
inflation and currency depreciation is likely to result in public
protests, as have happened sporadically over the past year.
The
president, John Mahama, and the National Democratic Congress (NDC)
government will bear the brunt of the blame for the situation, with the
opposition New Patriotic Party (NPP) attempting to act as a focus for
disenchanted Ghanaians to rally around, knowing that attacking the
government's economic record represents its best chance of taking power
at the elections set for November 2016.
In extreme cases public
anger can snowball into a popular uprising. However, such a level of
instability is unlikely in Ghana, where democracy is firmly established;
the entrenchment of the democratic process is the most powerful factor
in preventing popular unrest expanding to the point that it threatens
the political structure as a whole. Nonetheless, although Ghana's
democracy will shield it from a breakdown in political stability,
election-related tensions, particularly if close results are disputed by
the losing side, are likely to result in outbreaks of unrest.
The
NPP goes into the election period unhappy that its demands for a new
electoral roll have been rejected by the Electoral Commission in favour
of a cleaning¬up of the current register— which the NPP claim is biased
towards the NDC. A disputed election would be decided by the courts, as
happened in 2012. At that time all sides accepted the verdict.
However,
in 2015 the judiciary was hit by major corruption allegations. A lack
of trust in the judiciary would make it more likely that any 2016
election case verdict is not accepted, increasing the risk of
instability. However, if, as seems likely at present, there is a
transparent investigation into the corruption allegations that punishes
those guilty of wrongdoing, then trust should be improved enough for any
2016 election challenges to be handled without triggering instability.
After
a fraught 2016 election period, the threat of instability will recede
during 2017 19 as better economic performance helps to ease
frustrations, before another spike in tensions ahead of the 2020
elections. Outside of politically driven instability another important
risk is of terrorist attack. Attacks in early 2016 in neighbouring
Burkina Faso by Islamist extremists brought the threat closer to home.
Although the low incidence of sectarian tensions suggests that the
country—even if not without disenchanted youngsters—is not an ideal
breeding ground for radicalised aggressors, the porosity of its borders
remains a cause for concern.
Ghana is not likely to be a central
target for terrorists, but its close ties with the West and significant
ex-patriate population in Accra may draw the attention of extremists.
Ghana 3 Country Report February 2016 www.eiu.com © Economist
Intelligence Unit Limited 2016 Election watch There is little time for
Mr Mahama and the NDC to turn the economy around before the November
2016 presidential and legislative elections. The Economist Intelligence
Unit therefore expects Nana Akufo-Addo and the NPP to be victorious.
The
outcome is by no means a foregone conclusion, however, with the results
likely to be close. The NPP will need to work hard to attract votes
from outside its heartlands in central Ghana while maintaining internal
unity. Meanwhile, the NDC will continue to enjoy strong support in the
east and north of the country, owing to historical and tribal
allegiances. Greater Accra, a historical swing state, will be a key
battleground, and so tensions in this economic hub could disrupt
business operations. The following national elections will then be due
in 2020.
Whichever party wins in 2016 is expected to preside
over an improving economic situation and this will bolster their support
in 2020, making re-election the most likely outcome. However, Mr Mahama
would be constitutionally barred from standing again if victorious in
2016, so the NDC could face a damaging internal battle to succeed him,
which may play into the hands of the NPP. If Mr AkufoAddo is victorious
in 2016, he would be eligible to stand again in 2020, but would be 76
years old by then and so could face challenges from inside his party. |
|
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment